Packers XLV

Houston, We've Got A Few Problems

Posted October 12th, 2012 @ 06:10pm

OK, let me see if I've got this straight: The Packers are heading into Reliant Stadium Sunday night to face the 5-0 Texans. Their lackluster offense will be without its best running back, receiver and maybe its top two receiving tight ends. The defense will likely try to stop the NFL's best running back without its top run stopper.

Oh, throw in a frenzied crowd in a dome getting a rare shot at prime time.

Yep, the stars sure are aligned. But oddly enough, there are some intangibles working in the Pack's favor. Certainly facing Houston off a short week for them is helpful. Teams that are coming off Monday night road games face a change to the usual routine and coaches always complain about that. The Pack is 4-0 all-time in Houston and 5-1 on Sunday Night Football.

The Packers' dealing with the loss of Raji (who missed practice all week with an ankle injury, but is listed as questionable) pales in comparison to the loss of the Texans' leading tackler Brian Cushing. He tore his ACL on Monday night as is lost for the season. This is a talented defense, but it's now missing its soul and still feels the loss of fellow linebacker Demeco Ryans (traded to the Eagles before the draft). JJ Watt is the motor and the most disruptive player of the unit, but they lose a lot of their bark without Cushing.

It should open things up for the run game and the tight end, but the Pack is thin in both spots. Alex Green will get the start at tailback. Mike McCarthy says he'll ride the hot hand among all his guys, but I have a hard time believing Starks and Saine will get much of a leash. Pass protection will be needed as much as ball carrying with that sack-happy unit and neither has faced live action yet this year. Look for John Kuhn to get some play as the tailback this week.

If Finley and DJ Williams are unable to go, the Pack will turn to Tom Crabtree and Ryan Taylor, both of whom will have opportunities to make plays. They'll also need to stay in and block to help the tackles deal with the most fearsome pass rushing duo in the league: JJ Watt and Brooks Reed. Quite the haul in the '11 draft for the Texans. Many of you cheered Watt on in college and many of us drooled over Reed, seeing him as a potential mirror image for Clay Matthews on the Packers' defense.

That pass rush is the biggest concern for Aaron Rodgers and company and it's why it's absolutely essential McCarthy does not abandon the run. Hopefully Green or someone else will provide a threat to slow down Watt, Reed and company. If the season were over Watt would be the defensive player of the year. He's sacking (8 1/2), hitting (12 QB hits), tackling (11 for a loss) and deflecting (8 passes already). Needless to say, Newhouse and Bulaga, particularly Bulaga, need to play their best game of the season to give Rodgers a chance.

Offensively, the Texans run 54% of the time and when Arian Foster gets 20+ carries, they rarely lose. Raji didn't practice all week, so it's hard to believe he'll play, though he's listed as questionable (probably to try to keep Houston in the dark). We'll need to see a spirited effort from all of the D-linemen. Mike Neal showed some pop last week; he, Worthy and Wilson need to play their best game.

The passing attack isn't as fearless as it was the last couple of years. Andre Johnson is not the elite receiver he used to be--injuries and age have crept up on him. Kevin Walter moves the chains and is reliable. The Pack will have to contain tight end Owen Daniels, another former Badger who has become a very good pro. He and Matt Schaub have great chemistry and whether it's Charles Woodson or Nick Perry, Daniels needs to be shadowed all night.

It's a tough matchup all the way around. Without Benson, Jennings and Raji, the Pack appears to be short-handed. They're coming off the most unsettling defeat of the Mike McCarthy era and they're taking on an elite team itching to show the football world why they're at the top of most folks' power rankings.

One thing that tends to tips things in the NFL is urgency. The Packers have it and if they have designs on being the team we saw leading up to last December's Chiefs game and not the 4-5 team we've seen since, then they'll shock the NFL world and upset the Texans. But they need to show me that team before I believe I'll see it.

Texans 24 Packers 23


Post a Comment:

Please Enter the Validation Code Below

Comments (4):

Hard to believe the Texans are only 3 1/2 point favorites at home against the injury redidled Pack. The Vegas sharks are usually close. Davy....I see you have predicted the Pack losing and covering. With all the key injuries and matchup favorites for the Texans....the Pewaukee Prodigy(JJ Watt)....Arian Foster's running,Schwab's ball control offense it looks like a blowout on paper. However....Davy you hit on a key point...."URGENCY"!! The Pack and Rodgers have not played their best game of the year yet and with Houston's short week and the Pack's urgency it is time we see it. I will leave the score predicting to Larry, the "Voice", and you but if MM can adapt quicker to this games situations then he has shown this year this could be "that game" GO PACK GO !!

on October 12th, 2012 at 05:48pm

It's been said before, "...on any given Sunday...", and that's what we have here. There have been plenty of upsets so far this season - why not one for this game? I'll admit that logically this doesn't work to the Packer's benefit, but the intangibles should work in the Pack's favor; a Sunday night nationally televised game, one team undefeated, the other needing to make a statement. If they lose, it won't be by one point. The time has come to make that statement, and Head Cheese, I hope you're wrong. Pack 24, Texans 21.

on October 13th, 2012 at 04:00pm

It's not whether you win or lose but how you play the game. I think that's how we might best characterize this week's Packers at Houston game. The Packers are in the unaccustomed position of being the underdog. The last time they went into a game not favored was the Atlanta playoff, 24 consecutive regular and postseason games ago. I thought this game might be one where the Packers rallied and showed up big time, until I saw this week's injury list. I doubt there are enough bullets in the Packers' gun to pull this one off, even with a good game plan and maximum performance effort. Most important to me is getting out of this game without adding to the casualty list; especially not having Aaron Rodgers get hurt. A loss at this point, especially to a top AFC contender, does not spell the end of the season. Two years ago the Packers lost road games at Atlanta and New England but played competitively in both. As it would turn out those games were a real signal that Green Bay would make a successful Super Bowl run at the end of the year. I did a little "worst case scenario" for the Pack and "best cases" for the rest of the NFC North with the remaining schedule and can still find an 11-5 finish and another division title for Green Bay at the end of the season. Provided they can get key members of theri wounded back in action.

on October 13th, 2012 at 07:00am

This team hasn't shown "the stuff of champions" yet and although I agree losing to an AFC team at this point isn't really a nail in the coffin, the Pack need to show up. It's hard to envision a moral victory here, and a lot easier to argue this team to an 8 and 8 record right now. The NFL ebbs and flows and this team has yet to right the ship. The rooster is set, so lets see what MM can squeeze out these guys.

on October 13th, 2012 at 09:36pm

Blog Archive


Has Rodgers played his last game in green and gold?

Powered by: Avallo Panel